![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
morgandawn) wrote2014-12-16 01:05 pm
Fandom Does Not Use Technology. Technology Uses Fandom
Fandom usually jumps into technologies, uses them, and then acts surprised when we realize that we have no clue what we're doing or how the use of the new tech has changed an aspect of our fandom culture. Right now a few authors are posting notices that you need permission to link to their fanworks in "public spaces". Or that they'd prefer their readers comment on their fic where it was originally posted. Each author gets to unilaterally define what is public with the expectation that every reader will follow because that is part of the "social contract". So for today Goodreads = public and is not a place to list or review fanfic. Tumblr is OK (for now) because it is not seen as a "public" space.*
It used to be easier to know what to expect of other fans but the moment we went online, the fannish social contract was voided due to sheer size and complexity of online interactions. Add the fact that new platforms and new ways of interacting keep coming out every 20 minutes and you have a hot conceptual mess filled with poorly understood expectations.
I know that when we went online in the 1990s few of us had any idea that fans would be publicly posting their porn fanfic** to open access websites (no. stop. think of the children!), displaying their explicit art where anyone could see (blush), and tweeting their love of RPS and knotting fic (OMGWTFBB!). By those standards, we have all breached the original fannish social contract of keeping fandom a "safe space" simply by interacting with one another in public and online. And I suspect that 20 years down the road, we will again struggle to recognize "fandom" as it continues to be reshaped by technology.
So I would rather see us practice mindfulness and awareness that the tools and platforms we use change us and our culture instead of snapping at one another because we've changed and that we no longer know what to expect from one another.
Because to be honest, I have no clue any more. And I'd be wary of anyone who claims otherwise.
*Keep in mind that most fans don't bother to turn off Google indexing on their tumblr blogs (or their LJ...or their DW..or their twitter or their.....). And even if they do, every time someone else reblogs your content, if *their blog* is searchable by Google it will still be "public".
**A few of us did have in inkling but we all kept it quiet because we did not want to scare our fellow fans with our crazy visions of the future filled with flying fans sporting jetpack keyboards and tinhats.
no subject
I very much hear you on the author pages. That's not a great construct for fic, and I very much understand why writers are unhappy about that. Otoh, I do feel there are various levels of disingenuousness by many fans who do not lock and hide their fic and who regard recs and links and bookmarks other places as a good thing yet here they suddenly want to maintain authorly control. (Likewise, I was slightly bemused by the strong claims of community creation, which I incidentally agree singles out fanfic, at the same time as authors claimed their ownership over their words...)
Anyway, yes, the author pages are a bad thing, but I'm not sure how the suggested related books are fundamentally different from the way many if not most fans use bookmarking sites searching by tags or follow tags on Tumblr. It's not just your friends who suggest and rec and criticize--it's anyone who tags (behold the don't tag the hate battles).
As for my own experience--I wasn't trying to compare fiction and nonfiction, as published text with a work of love (though I'd argue that our book was a labor of fannish love and we are not making any money either :)--but yes, my awareness in readership was there. What i was trying to get at was that the review was NOT necessarily the assumed readership. But by putting something out there I can't control who'll read it. Just like a fan who puts something publicly online can't control who reads it.
I'm not sure how Morgandawn used to feel--I used to be a huge proponent of maintaining closed spaces and keeping fandom away from mundanes, the press, anyone who didn't actively search it out and knew our history...and I think over the last years, I realized both practically that fandom is ever growing and fannish activities have mainstreamed to be point of clear distinction of in and out becoming near meaningless, and theoretically that that is not a bad thing. It feels like a loss to me emotionally, but the barrier to entry into fandom has become lower again and again and that's a good thing. It means our demographics are changing the more mainstream we are, and that's not a bad thing!
Anyway, sorry to preach...I very much hear you on the author page, but everything else, to me, seems like one group of fans demanding that other fans follow their rules. And that can't (and really probably shouldn't) ever work. It didn't work when fans started going online, when lotrips and popslash fans started mainstreaming rpf and HP fans underage. It didn't work when various waves of fans broke the fourth wall and when wholesale copying became the norm on Tumblr rather than linking. (Heck, I remember when fans asked to link and that clearly didn't/couldn't work on the Internet).
Hey, we do agree about Tumblr :) A lot!!!
to answer cathexys question about how I used to feel about fandom visibility
oh and you were forbidden to mention the mailing list online
As list admin, I had to police these policies and as you can imagine it quickly became tedious and then futile as fandom overran us and stampeded online.
Bur for decades I, like most fans, felt we should be playing in "fandom only safe spaces."
Which is why I found LJ so terrifying - you were not just talking about fandom issues - everyone was blogging about their cats, their kids, their SO, their bunions...TMI in the open.
And I still felt we were protected by what I call "herd immunity" (or the "great school of fish in the sea protects the individual fish" - it was not privacy per se, but obscurity we relied upon.
But even obscurity is being eroded more and more with content aggregators linking our identities and activities and selling the info (or offering it up for free for ad revenue). I posted today about a fan who outed themselves to me via their LinkedIn account and that is only one of the many social media outlets.
So my attitude has shifted away from trying to police fandom, to trying to get fandom to recognize the shape of things that are, to trying to get fans to use the limited privacy tools that we have as best as we can, and to stop snapping at each other for something none of us can control.
no subject